POSSIBILITIES OF LINGUISTIC EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL CASES REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OF PROVIDING BENEFITS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-9656/2025-17-4Keywords:
communicative act, communicative situation, communicative tactics, linguistic expertise, boundaries of expert competence, non-verbal information, object of research, theory of speech actsAbstract
The article focuses on the possibilities of forensic linguistic expertise in cases of establishing the facts of the offer of an unlawful benefit. The main provisions of the concept of the competence of an expert are outlined. The characteristic features of the objects of research are characterized, the requirements for their registration are given, for the purpose of ordering forensic linguistic expertise. The linguistic and legal aspects of studying the concept of offering an undue advantage are considered. Attention is paid to a thorough study of the communicative situation as a whole, the mandatory analysis of communicative tactics and strategies that reflect the set of speech moves thought out in advance by the addressee and implemented in the process of the communicative act, aimed at achieving the communicative goal. The main possibilities of linguistic research are established, including, for example, determining the addressee and addressee of conversations, their communicative tactics and strategies, reconstructing the meanings of incomplete sentences from the contextual content of the situation, establishing sentences with an incentive character, restoring presuppositional semantic blocks from the content of the communicative situation, which are non- verbal, subtextual means of communication, etc. t is emphasized that the competence of the expert linguist does not include the establishment of the speaker’s non-communicative intentions, as well as the degree of implementation of the speech act, the nature of the proposed benefit (whether the benefit is unlawful), since this is related to the establishment of the form of guilt and the specific composition and legal qualification of the crime. The main groups of speech acts of the proposal to provide any benefit are given, the most common grammatical indicators of the analyzed speech act of the proposal are highlighted.
References
Кримінальний кодекс України. ULR: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14?find=1&text=364#Text (дата звернення: 28.05.2025).
Словник української мови: в 11 томах. Том 5, 1974. С. 366. ULR: https://sum.in.ua/p/5/366/1 (дата звернення: 30.05.2025).
Юридичний словник. ULR: https://kodeksy.com.ua/dictionary/n/nepravomirna_ vigoda.htm (дата звернення: 30.05.2025).
Синиця А. Логіко-філософський аспект теорії «мовленнєвих актів». ULR: http://vlp.com.ua/files/03_50.pdf (дата звернення: 29.05.2025).
Юмрукуз А. А. Мовленнєві акти згоди та незгоди в англійськомовному бізнес-дискурсі: функціонально-структурні особливості. Науковий журнал державного Львівського університету безпеки життєдіяльності «Львівський філологічний часопис». Львів, 2018. № 3. С. 292–295.
Семенюк О. А., Паращук В. Ю. Основи теорії комунікації : навчальний посібник. Київ : Видавничий дім «Академія», 2010. 240 с.
Врабель Т. Т. Словотворча прагматика у сучасній англійській мові : дисертація на здобуття наук. ступ. канд. філол. наук за спец. 10.02.04 – германські мови. Ужгород, 2005. 241 с.